[jifty-devel] Re: [Jifty-commit] r3016 - in Jifty-DBI/trunk: .lib/Jifty/DBI

Andrew Sterling Hanenkamp andrew.hanenkamp at boomer.com
Mon Mar 19 09:49:22 EDT 2007


Sorry about that.

I did run the tests after the merge, before and after the push(and am in
the habit of doing so), but my local working copy didn't have any
problems at any point during my testing. 

For whatever reason, it looks like my local copy didn't get the breakage
it pummeled svn.jifty.org with or I must have magically tested all
around it.

Anyway, thanks to you it's all better now.

Cheers,
Andrew

--
Andrew Sterling Hanenkamp
Interaction Developer
Boomer Consulting, Inc.
 
1.785.537.2358 ext. 17
1.888.266.6375 ext. 17
1.785.537.4545 (fax)
 
610 Humboldt
Manhattan, KS 66502
 
http://www.boomer.com/about/team/andrew-hanenkamp.html
andrew.hanenkamp at boomer.com

-----Original Message-----
From: jifty-devel-bounces at lists.jifty.org
[mailto:jifty-devel-bounces at lists.jifty.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Vincent
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 3:02 PM
To: Nifty apps in a Jiffy
Subject: Re: [jifty-devel] Re: [Jifty-commit] r3016 - in
Jifty-DBI/trunk: .lib/Jifty/DBI


On Mar 18, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote:

> The diffs in here feel...not quite right. Was this an intentional 
> commit or a mismerge?
> On Mar 18, 2007, at 6:05 AM, jifty-commit at lists.jifty.org wrote:
> 	
>> Author: sterling
>> Date: Sun Mar 18 06:04:30 2007
>> New Revision: 3016
>>


I reverted. It was failing lots of tests due to this commit. Next time,
running tests after a merge gone awry would be cool ;) Thanks for all
the doc hacking, though -j



More information about the jifty-devel mailing list