[jifty-devel] Re: [Jifty-commit] r1237 - in Jifty-DBI/trunk: .
lib/Jifty lib/Jifty/DBI
Jesse Vincent
jesse at bestpractical.com
Fri Jun 9 18:58:11 EDT 2006
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:29:00PM -0400, jifty-commit at lists.jifty.org wrote:
> Author: seanmil
> Date: Fri Jun 9 18:28:55 2006
> New Revision: 1237
>
> Modified:
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/ (props changed)
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/lib/Jifty/DBI.pm
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/lib/Jifty/DBI/Collection.pm
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/lib/Jifty/DBI/Record.pm
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/01records.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/01searches.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/02-column_constraints.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/02records_object.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/06filter_datetime.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/06filter_truncate.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/06filter_utf8.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/11schema_records.t
> Jifty-DBI/trunk/t/utils.pl
>
> Log:
> r439 at pc102: sean | 2006-06-09 18:28:49 -0400
> * Make Jifty::DBI::Record::_init() expect a hash like Jifty::Record does
> * Fixes 'is_distinct' failure when used in Jifty
>
>
It looks like this is a bit of a backwards incompatible change, but that
it would be pretty easy to fix. Breaking APIs is ungood, especially when
there's code out there that depends on the old API. If there _is_ a
reason to break the API, it should get flagged good and loud.
-jesse
More information about the jifty-devel
mailing list