[jifty-devel] Template::Declare Import Bug

David E. Wheeler david at kineticode.com
Mon Oct 5 21:44:23 EDT 2009

On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:37 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:

> Is `path_for` something that's actually used for something? If so,
> maybe the package name should be passed to it?
>     Foo->path_for('Bar'); # returns /foo/foo
>     Foo->path_for('Baz'); # returns /otherfoo/foo
> Thoughts?

FYI, I commented out path_for() and the two tests for it, and all  
tests passed. So it doesn't seem necessary to the internals. Is it  
used externally, e.g., in Jifty? Is it necessary? Could it be  



More information about the jifty-devel mailing list